首页> 外文OA文献 >Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
【2h】

Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)

机译:确定和比较四肩患者报告的结局指标(PROM)的最小可检测变化(SDC)和最小重要变化(MIC)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: There is a need for better interpretation of orthopedic treatment effects. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are already commonly used for patient evaluation. PROMs can be used to determine treatment effects in research as well as in clinical settings by calculating change scores, with pre- and post-treatment evaluation. The smallest detectable change (SDC) and minimal important change (MIC) are two important benchmarks for interpreting these change scores. The purpose was to determine the SDC and the MIC for four commonly used shoulder-related PROMs: Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH and QuickDASH), and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS).Methods: A cohort of 164 consecutive patients with shoulder problems visiting an orthopedic outpatient clinic completed the SST, DASH, and the OSS at their first visit and 6 months after operative or non-operative treatment. The SDC was calculated with a test re-test protocol (0-2 weeks). For the MIC, change scores (0-6 months of evaluation) were calculated in seven subgroups of patients, according to an additional self-administered ranking of change over time (anchor-based mean change technique). The MIC is defined as the average score of the 'slightly improved' group according to the anchor. The QuickDASH was computed from the DASH.Results: The SDC of the SST was 2.8, DASH 16.3, QuickDASH 17.1, and OSS 6.0. The MIC change score for the SST was 2.2, DASH 12.4, QuickDASH 13.4, and OSS 6.0.Conclusion: This study shows that on an individual patient-based level, when taking into account SDC and MIC, the change score should exceed 2.8 points for the SST, 16.3 points for the DASH, 17.1 points for the QuickDASH, and 6.0 points for the OSS to have a clinically relevant change on a PROM, which is not due to measurement error. © 2013 van Kampen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
机译:背景:需要更好地解释骨科治疗效果。患者报告的结局指标(PROM)已经普遍用于患者评估。 PROM可用于通过计算变化评分以及治疗前和治疗后评估来确定研究以及临床环境中的治疗效果。最小的可检测变化(SDC)和最小重要变化(MIC)是解释这些变化得分的两个重要基准。目的是确定四种常用的与肩膀相关的PROM的SDC和MIC:简单肩膀测试(SST),手臂,肩膀和手部残疾(DASH和QuickDASH)以及牛津肩膀得分(OSS)。 :一组连续164例肩部问题的患者在骨科门诊就诊,他们在首次就诊时以及手术或非手术治疗后6个月完成了SST,DASH和OSS。 SDC通过重新测试协议(0-2周)进行计算。对于MIC,根据其他随时间变化的自我管理排名(基于锚的平均改变技术),计算了七个亚组患者的改变得分(评估的0-6个月)。 MIC定义为根据锚点,“略有改善”组的平均得分。结果是:SST的SDC为2.8,DASH 16.3,QuickDASH 17.1和OSS 6.0。 SST的MIC变化得分为2.2,DASH 12.4,QuickDASH 13.4和OSS 6.0。结论:本研究表明,在基于患者的个人水平上,如果考虑SDC和MIC,则变化得分应超过2.8分。 SST,DASH的16.3点,QuickDASH的17.1点和OSS的6.0点在PROM上具有临床相关的变化,这不是由于测量误差引起的。 ©2013 van Kampen等;被许可人BioMed Central Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号